The Pros and Cons of Indutrialization

Everything in this world has its good sides and bad sides. When we make decision, we also think about good sides and bad sides about it. This thinking process also happens to the government when they change from agrarian country to industrial country. First, let's talk about the industrialization revolution. Industrialization revolution first happened in Great Britain in the late 18th and early 19th centuries. At that time, there occurred a transition from manual-labour-based economy towards machine-based manufacturing. These change first happened in a textile industries, the development of iron-making industries and the increased use of refined coal. Later on, trade expansion was enabled by improved roads and railways. From Great Britain, these effects spread throughout Western Europe and North America during the 19th century, and finally to most of the world. So, what's the pros and cons of industrialization?

In one hand, industrialization has several pros. With machine-based manufacturing and the new technology, the cost of producing goods are less than in manual-labour-based manufacturing. This means we can allocate the the resources more efficiently and cut the production costs. Then, we can allocate the remaining resources (it can be money, time, or another capital) to produce another goods. The effect of producing this goods is an increase in supply (quantity of the goods produced) which leads to decrease in the price of the goods in the market. The producers also get more income by producing more goods. The country also can increase their income by taxing the producer or by exporting the goods to another country.

In the another hand, industrialization also has several cons. Sometimes, most factory labored children under age to work for the company. Most of the workers are also paid in a very low wages and they have to work outrages amount of hours in a very poor condition. Another cons is that most factory gives a bad effect on the environment; most of them emits greenhouse gas such as carbon dioxide (CO2) and methane (CH4) ,which cause the greenhouse effect, that leads to global warming.

Of course all the country try to minimize the bad side of industrialization. They makes the law that prohibits factory owner to labor children under age to work. They also made rent floor or minimum wages for the worker. This means that the factory owner cannot pay the workers under the minimum wage. And for the last environmental cons, all the country in the world now work together to solve the global warming problem. Let's hope that we can minimize the bad side of industrialization or even lose it. Personally, I agree with industrialization because the advantage of it is more than the disadvantage of it and because that the bad sides are now being countered.

Same Claim, Different Media

I just have submitted my essay for the first English major assignment. I made a claim that sports can unify people together into small group or large group. In my essay, I use badminton as an example that can unify Indonesian people. In this blog, I would like to share my another experience about it but not by words, instead I will use some videos and also some photos. There is a saying "pictures is worth a thousand words" and maybe there should be saying "video is worth a thousand pictures".

The kick-off

The touchdown

The Parade

The Marching band

Georgia Tech supporters

Georgia Tech cheerleaders

Mississippi State University Supporters

This football match is between Georgia Tech and Mississippi State University which is won by Georgia Tech by 38-7. We can see that a lot of GT supporters cheered their team together even tough they hadn't known each other before. This also happened to me. I cheered for my team eve tough I have never played football neither that I have watched it or have known the rules before. That are some evidences that prove that sports can unify people together (in this case, football can unifies Georgia Tech supporters that include students, faculties, alumnus, etc).

In the end, I still don't really understand about the complete rules about football. What I know is the basic rules that we must take down the enemy's player, get the ball, and bring it to the end of the enemy's zone. Go Jackets!!!

The South's Development, What Do You Think About It?

In my previous blog, I told about a claim that is made by A. V. Huff. The claim is how recent and profound the South's transformation had been. To me as a newcomer in Atlanta, I agree with the claim that A. V. Huff made.

The first reason why I agree with the

 claim is about Atlanta's architectural and method of transportation, the city where I live now. In the past, Atlanta did not have as many skycrappers as it is now. The picture in the left is Peachtree Street in 1907. It looks pretty old-fashioned. The transportation vehicles in that picture are also different from now. The right picture is Peachtree Street right now. There are a lot of cars nowadays and the building is taller than Atlanta back in 1907.

Below is the video that shows Atlanta development from time to time. The real movie about Atlanta starts on minute 2:10.

A. V. Huff also said that the he still picks cotton crop in the 1940s when he was still a child. But today, a lot of Southern kid does not even know what cotton crop looks like. Below is a graph that I find in my economic books. It tells about the percentage of jobs that people have during that period and what goods is produced during that time.

From the graph, we can see that in the 1940s, the percentage of people that work in agricultural area is around 20%. In the 2000s, the percentage of people that work in agricultural area drops into around 3%. This decrease also means the decrease in farm area. That is the reason why today's kids do not work in the farm during school's year and why they don't know what cotton crop looks like. Finally, below is two images that pictured what A. V. Huff said about kids picking cotton crop during school's year.

Argument/Claim & Evidence

I later put this to A. V. Huff, a historian of the South at Furman University in upland South Carolina. He responded by reminding me just how recent and profound the South's transformation had been. Huff told of picking cotton as child in the 1940s, when the rhythm of the school year still moved to the cotton crop. Children attended class in midsummer, during lay-by season, and returned to the fields for the autumn harvest.

Yet in Huff's own lifetime, this most fundamental of Southern rites had all but vanished from the experience of many Southerners. Many of Huff's students-mostly middle-class kids from the suburbs of Atlanta and other cities-had never ever seen a cotton crop. Huff illustrated his point by inviting me sit in on one of his classes. Lecturing on Eli Whitney's invention of the cotton gin, he produced a boll from his family's farm as a teaching prop. The students passed the boll around, gazing at it with wonderment, as if at a mastodon's tooth.

Fewer than 5 percent of present-day Southerners now worked the land, and Dixie was fast becoming the nation's new industrial heartland, with car plants sprouting across the former cotton belt. Per capita income in the South-half the national average when Huff was born in 1937-now ranked close to the rest of America. The eleven states of the Old Confederacy comprised the fifth-largest economy in the world.

This text is based on Confederates in the Attic chapter 4 page 86-87

What is the argument?

A. V. Huff tells Toni Horwitz about how recent and profound the South's transformation have been. (the orange sentence in the paragraph)

Who is the audience?

Toni Horwitz

What is the reason?

A. V. Huff  said that the most fundamental of Southern rites (picking up cotton crop) had vanished nowadays. (the green sentence in the paragraph)

What is the appeal?

• Ethos: A. V. Huff is a historian of the South at Furman University. He also has experienced what Southener's kid usually do during school year (picking up the cotton crop).
• Pathos: We can see the emotional appeal when the kids are gazing the boll with wonderment.
• Logos: There are fewer than 5% of Southerners that worked on land. This means that most southern area has changed from agricultural area to industrial area. (the blue sentences in the paragraph)

Is it successful?

Yes it is. A. V. Huff makes a lot of appeals from ethical appeal, emotional appeal and logical appeal. He also support his argument/claim with evidences.